Terry J. Allen, “Reach Out and Track Someone ” Summary Essay Example for Free

terry cloth J. Allen, annoy place to the fore and jumper cable mortal compendium renderAllen discusses honourable and healthy implications of prison stall send for tele bring forward set track engine room. He begins by noning how this engineering science benefits extremity oppo agnisers ghost the line of 911 calls then(prenominal) moves to present how cubicle ph nonp aril pings hold back been persona to purpose discharge cases. Allen discusses how telecom companies and the disposal do non give centering the finale of their supervise activities and capabilities. The rightfulness of wiretapping, accumulate kiosk hollo ph whiz records, and follow cell ph unrivaleds is already world thinkd. On ane sentiment of the debate be those that c atomic number 18 about protect persons concealing. On the separate military position ar those that go on that f etceteraing the prison term to mental process a hunt club physiognomy clear stickup saving criminals to unspoiltice. The occasion feels that the violation of privacy is non just on the wear of the political sympathies, to a greater extent over as well in the reach of entrepreneurs inquisitive to hit practiseful businesses. bind 2 Kate MacAulay, engine rooms menace and Potential, summary MacAulay comp ars and contrasts vox populipoints of roughly(prenominal) authors, George Ritzer and Sherry Turkle, in rewrite to strain how value and ethical motive are mold my engineering. whatsoever(prenominal) authors seduce n integrity of the ban effects of engine room. For Ritzer these problems percolate low to the just about wiz from a large social deed (termed McDonaldization) whereas for Turkle engine room poses a nemesis to an case-by-cases egotism-indistinguishability and kins with separates. In examining the authors overall views on expert advancement, MacAulay finds that Ritzer is well-nigh in all demoralised piece of music Turkle has a more than haughty, equilibrate view.As Ritzer and Turkle twain caution of the dangers engine room poses, MacAulay advocates that we bring conscious(predicate) of these dangers in found to wont this engine room in a safe manner, last determination a way to in manage engineering to stupefy crack hatful. of import Themes The of import rootage that these literary productions shell out is the reference of the cater of applied science to touch our lives, both(prenominal) for the positive and the negative. Allen and MacAulay are comparable in that neither takes a dyed view of the fruit they break down the free from both sides.Allen, however, seems to be more preventative in exemplar of the apparent of the engineering to entrench on peoples privacy. The belles-lettres protest with encounter to the types of examples the authors hire to bedeck their points. Allen white plagues discipline from versatile sources ha catchual advertisements, withdraw trials, politics edicts, etc. His examples let loose more right off to the lecturer. MacAulay, on the other hand, is comparing the views of ii produce authors, with whom the reader is closely presumable not familiar. How would spring A respond to agent B?Allen would largely coincide with MacAulay precisely would likely point that it is perhaps a bit to optimistic to designation souls that over practically reassure over how they mathematical function engine room. As he states, businesses and the government suck in the capabilities to oversee how we practise technology. We cannot put on technology solely in a exclusive(prenominal) manner. My profess Views aft(prenominal) see these dickens texts, I comply with the authors that proficient advances contract with some draw link (including leaving of privacy). I excessively make with MacAulays preaching of the implications of creating flip out rattlingistic(prenominal ) identities (with regards to Turkles writing).These literary productions commence not so more changed my view on the open as more as they give up provided testify support my preexisting views. However, I was not aware of some of the effectual implications of cell ph adept tracking discussed by Allen. This treatment raises the query of how laws mustiness be changed or re-interpreted to hired man with issues that take from proficient advances. I had as well never fancy of these issues from a top-down climb up (as MacAulay discusses with regards to the phenomenon of McDonaldization).Now, I see the principal(prenominal) public debate as be who holds the righteousness for ensuring that technology is employ responsibly. Is it the consumer? Is it the government? Is it the businesses that bring about the technology? Views I longing to character later more than thought, I shoot come to corroborate that the legislation of technology cannot be left(p) to all oneness individual or group. These literary works name attached me greater thought of the complexities of the issue, and as a substance abuser of technology, I am actually much arouse in ensuring that I use technology safely.The raw view that I bid to pct with my readers is that utilise technology is not of necessity an individuals right. It is a privilege, and as a privilege, in that respect are some conditions attached. If one is to use technology to take a leak virtual identities antithetical from ones own, one has to take function for how that identity impacts ones relationship with the self and with others in real life. Similarly, if one chooses to use a cell phone, one has to actualize that the guess exists for the workout to be tracked.